Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /nfs/c02/h06/mnt/25821/domains/sundaymagazine.org/html/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 284

From 1890: The First Text Messages

I’m trying something new today. Sometimes in my research I find an interesting old article that I wouldn’t normally post because it’s not from the Sunday Magazine section, or it’s from further than 100 years ago so I’ll never get to it. Instead of letting these go unused, I figure I’ll occasionally post them midweek during what would otherwise be slow weeks. Since this weekend I only have three articles to post, it seems like a good week to try it.

From November 30, 1890 (a Sunday, although not in the Magazine Section)



Telegraph operators on opposite sides of the country had some time to get to know each other when they weren’t busy sending other people’s messages. “Metaphorically they shake hands cordially twice a day — when they begin work and when they end it. And when business is dull they hold long conversations, with hundreds of miles — perhaps thousands — separating them, as two friends might do over a dinner table.”

What really caught my eye, though, is that the abbreviations they used seem a lot like the abbreviations used in today’s text messages.

In their conversations telegraphers use a system of abbreviations which enables them to say considerably more in a certain period of time then they otherwise could. Their morning greeting to a friend in a distant city is usually “g. m.,” and the farewell for the evening, “g. n.,” the letters of course standing for good morning and good night. The salutation may be accompanied by an inquiry by one as to the health of the other, which would be expressed thus: “Hw r u ts mng?” And the answer would be: “I’m pty wl; hw r u?” or “I’m nt flg vy wl; fraid I’ve gt t mlaria.”

By the time these courtesies have taken place some early messages have come from the receiving department or from some other wire, and the man before whom they are placed says to his friend many miles away: “Wl hrs a fu; Gol hang ts everlastin grind. I wish I ws rich.” And the other man says: “No rest fo t wickd, min pen,” the last two words indicating that he wants the sender to wait a minute while he adjusts and tests his pen. Presently he clicks out “g a,” meaning “go ahead,” and the day’s work has begun.

I’m not sure what “Wl hrs a fu” is supposed to mean. But it sounds like “min pen” is an 1890 equivalent of today’s instant messager’s “afk brb.”

A couple months ago (in this blog) but actually 20 years later (in real time), the New York Times Sunday Magazine ran an article explaining that these conversations between telegraph operators were how jokes went viral in 1910. So surely there must have been a telegraph equivalent of LOL or ROFL, right?

Operators laugh over a wire, or rather, they convey the fact that they are amused. They do this by telegraphing “ha, ha.” Very great amusement is indicated by sending “ha” slowly and repeating it several times, and a smile is expressed by sending “ha” once or perhaps twice. Transmitting it slowly and repeating it tells the perpetrator of the joke at the other end of the wire that the listener is leaning back in his chair and laughing long and heartily.

So it looks like “ha” was the “LOL” of 1890. And it makes sense, when you consider how easy it is to telegraph “ha” compared to “LOL” or “ROFL” in Morse Code. “Ha” has a nice rhythm to it. Try tapping them out on your desk and see for yourself:

HA: •••• •−
LOL: •−•• −−− •−••
ROFL: •−• −−− ••−• •−••

I was also fascinated to discover that telegraph operators learned to identify each other by how the dots and dashes were transmitted across the wire, and could even distinguish a male operator from a female:

No two operators send alike. The click of the instrument is always the same to the ear of a man who does not understand it, but one operator recognizes the sending of another if he has ever heard it before for any length of time, just as a familiar face is recognized. Operator “Tommy” Snaggs leaves New-York, and, after roaming from one city to another, finally lands in the Galveston (Texas) office and goes to work. He is put down to work a wire running to Kansas City. The man in Kansas City begins to send. Mr. Snaggs pricks up his ears and interrupts the sender. “Ain’t tt u Billy Robinson?” he asks, and the other man says, “Yes, tts me, & ur ole Tommy Snaggs.” Mr. Snaggs returns, “tts wo I am, I thot I reconized ur sendin.” Then they devote a few moments to telling of their travels. The last time they worked on the same wire one was in Boston and the other in Montreal.

It is a peculiar fact also that an experienced operator can almost invariably distinguish a woman’s sending from a man’s. There is nearly always some peculiarity about a woman’s style of transmission. it is not necessarily a fault. Many women send very clearly and make their dots and dashes precisely as they were intended to be made. It is impossible to describe the peculiarity, but there is no doubt of its existence. Nearly all women have a habit of rattling off a lot of meaningless dots before they say anything. But some men do that too. A woman’s touch is lighter than a man’s, and her dots and dashes will not carry so well on a very long circuit. That is presumably the reason why in all large offices the women are usually assigned to work the wires running to various parts of the cities.

When two operators fight across the telegraph, it’s called a “fight circuit” and it’s pretty futile because it’s impossible for two operators tapping at once to tell what the other is saying. The article tells a humorous old story of one operator who set up a rudimentary chat bot to fight for him (possibly passing the Turing test 22 years before Alan Turing was even born):

They fought for some time. Neither would yield. The man at Albany, who was old and astute, saw that the man at Syracuse, who was young and stubborn, was in for an all-night struggle. The Albany man looked around for a proxy. He found it in the clock wire, which was a wire attached to the clock’s pendulum, the swaying of which acted to open and close the circuit. He connected the Syracuse wire with the clock wire and went home to bed, leaving the Syracuse man valorously battling with the tick-tick, tick-tick of the clock. The old story concludes with the veracious statement that when the Albany man reached the office the next morning he heard the Syracuse man still fighting the clock, and that when the former disconnected the clock wire and closed the circuit the latter snapped out triumphantly, “I downed you at last, did I?”

•••• •− •••• •−.

Possibly related articles:


Written by David

August 10th, 2010 at 12:45 pm

Posted in Humor,Life,Technology

23 Responses to 'From 1890: The First Text Messages'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. I’d guess that “Wl hrs a fu” is “Well here’s a few.”

    Thanks for writing about this. Very interesting stuff. …. ._ …. ._ indeed :)

    Jon the Geek

    10 Aug 10 at 1:18 PM

  2. Wl hrs a fu -> Worked long hours, a few.

    There is a song I can’t remember with very similar lyrics, it means he has worked a few long days/nights in a row.


    12 Aug 10 at 12:27 PM

  3. “Wl hrs a fu” = Well, here’s a funny.

    He’s implying there’s a joke afoot, a necessary phrase since the emoticon was not successfully implemented until the OSS discovered its usefulness in WWII.


    12 Aug 10 at 6:46 PM

  4. I agree with Jon the Geek, ‘Wl hrs a fu’ = \Well, here’s a few (messages to transmit)\

    makes sense in the context of the rest of the message, where the operator is complaining about work


    13 Aug 10 at 1:10 AM

  5. This was absolutely fascinating. Thank you so much for posting it!!


    14 Aug 10 at 9:24 PM

  6. I believe ‘Wl hrs a fu’ is “Well, hours are few,” which people even now say when they’re trying to get off the phone and get back to work.


    14 Aug 10 at 11:09 PM

  7. Amateur radio operators use hi-hi for laughter in Morse code. It’s a teensy bit shorter to send than ha, and perhaps sounds a bit like tee-heeing laughter. Ha=di-di-di-dit di-dah, Hi=di-di-di-dit di-dit.

    Although much code these days is keyed with precision by computers, people sending by hand often have very distinct styles.

    Although sending and receiving Morse Code is a dying art, it is an enjoyable skill, and the only human readable digital communications.


    16 Aug 10 at 8:25 PM

  8. @George: how about braille?


    18 Aug 10 at 6:46 PM

  9. ROFL was originally RIDSMHA — Rolling in the dust slapping my horse’s ass.

    Hatoy Butch

    20 Aug 10 at 5:50 PM

  10. Tom Standage took a close look at the telegraph culture in his book, The Victorian Internet, and his perspective was similar to yours. This NYT article sounds a lot like his description; I wouldn’t be surprised if this were part of his source material.


    Dan Fingerman

    22 Aug 10 at 4:37 PM

  11. Everyone I know says “ha” instead of “LOL”. Not exactly sure why… maybe because lol seems too internety/fake/the kind of thing mom writes on facebook


    27 Jul 11 at 2:16 PM

  12. Loved this article. Great insight into the way things used to be. Sort of makes me appreciate how far we’ve come.

    Kenneth Trent

    27 Jul 11 at 4:05 PM

  13. As a retired USN brass pounder I used TTY a large majority of the time. Interesting article. An operator’s individual keying style is referred to as their fist.

    Kenneth: Is almost impossible to comprehend how far comms have advanced. In the 60’s an average Morse operator probably averaged around 25 WPM with a straight key. Using a speed key increased that quite a lot. TTY was 45, 60, or 100 WPM. Now we easily talk about GigaBytes per second. GGGG


    27 Jul 11 at 4:50 PM

  14. I think Jon the Geek is right. The prior sentence says that messages started to come in, “Well here’s a few”, followed by the reciever saying he’s testing the pen and then “Go ahead”.

    Really interesting article!


    28 Jul 11 at 2:01 PM

  15. I used to be a homeless rodeo clown but now I am a world class magician !


    28 Jul 11 at 4:36 PM

  16. Is it just me or is this article trying to romantize about LOL, ROTFL and other unacceptably dumbening netspeak? Yuck.


    31 Jul 11 at 6:53 AM

  17. Thank you for sharing, great research. Was a fascinating read with my Sunday morning coffee!

    Kirsten Winkler

    31 Jul 11 at 8:15 AM

  18. Of course the article is trying to romanticize LOL, ROTFL, etc. They deserve to be romanticized as long-lost ancestors of treasured (apparently) new arrivals to the English language!

    Sasha Volokh

    31 Jul 11 at 4:53 PM

  19. I still use those abreviations in amateur radio telegraphy we call “cw” for continuous wave. We still use International Morse Code. Telegraphy is only dying because todays amateurs are lazy and want instant gratification. Its old and its old tech, but it still works well.


    2 Aug 11 at 8:38 PM

  20. What a splendid read this morning. Very happy to have stumbled across it in my searches.

    AJ Sikes

    2 Apr 12 at 12:39 PM

  21. The old man in Albany with the cock, that’s hilarious. Or shall I say •••• •−


    14 Apr 12 at 2:04 AM

  22. Repeating comment sans emb. spelling mistake: The old man in Albany with the clock, that’s hilarious. Or shall I say •••• •−


    14 Apr 12 at 2:05 AM

  23. I really enjoyed this article. I recently read a novel called ‘Wired Love – A romance of dots and dashes’ ~ by Ella Cheever Thayer, who was once a telegraph operator herself. She describes the conversations and life-styles of the operators in such a lively, funny and modern way that it almost impossible to believe that the book was written in 1879! I discuss the book at length here on my blog if you are interested. The novel itself is a fascinating and well worth the read. While I have a hard copy, I know it is available free on-line due to lapse of copyright.

    My Book Affair

    3 Nov 12 at 5:22 AM

Leave a Reply